What the Mifflin-St Jeor equation is
The Mifflin-St Jeor equation is a predictive formula for resting energy expenditure published in 1990 by Mifflin, St Jeor and colleagues in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. It was built to improve on the older Harris-Benedict equation and has repeatedly been found to be the most accurate of the common equations for healthy adults. It needs only weight, height, age and sex, which is why it became the first-line formula in dietetic practice. The equation estimates basal metabolic rate (BMR) — the calories burned at complete rest — and you multiply that by an activity factor to get total daily energy expenditure (TDEE). Its main limitation is that it treats all body weight alike: it can read high in people with obesity and low in very muscular people, where Katch-McArdle, which uses lean mass, does better.
Common Uses for Mifflin-St Jeor Calculator
- Calculate BMR with the equation used as the clinical default
- Convert BMR to TDEE with the standard activity factors
- Compare Mifflin-St Jeor with Harris-Benedict and Katch-McArdle
- Build a calorie target from a defensible baseline
- Check whether another calculator's number is plausible
The Mifflin-St Jeor equation in full
The equation uses metric units and returns kilocalories per day. For men: BMR = (10 × weight in kg) + (6.25 × height in cm) − (5 × age in years) + 5. For women: BMR = (10 × weight in kg) + (6.25 × height in cm) − (5 × age in years) − 161. The only difference between the sexes is the final constant, +5 versus −161 — a 166 kcal gap at identical size and age. If you work in pounds and inches, convert first: 1 lb = 0.4536 kg and 1 inch = 2.54 cm.
How to use this calculator
Enter sex, age, height and weight in metric or imperial units. The calculator returns BMR from the Mifflin-St Jeor equation and shows the same inputs through Harris-Benedict and Katch-McArdle so you can see the estimation range. To turn BMR into a daily calorie target, multiply by the activity factor that matches your real week, not your best week. The optional body-fat field is only used by Katch-McArdle; Mifflin-St Jeor does not require it.
The standard activity factors (1.2 to 1.9)
TDEE = BMR × activity factor. The multipliers below are the long-standing convention used by the American Council on Exercise and most dietetic guidance. Pick the lower level when in doubt: overestimating activity is the most common reason a calorie target fails.
- 1.2 — Sedentary: desk job, little or no deliberate exercise.
- 1.375 — Lightly active: light exercise or sport 1-3 days a week.
- 1.55 — Moderately active: moderate exercise 3-5 days a week.
- 1.725 — Very active: hard exercise 6-7 days a week.
- 1.9 — Extra active: physical job, or training twice a day.
Worked example: the same body, two sexes
Take a 30-year-old who is 175 cm and 72 kg. For a man: (10 × 72) + (6.25 × 175) − (5 × 30) + 5 = 720 + 1,093.75 − 150 + 5 = 1,668.75, about 1,669 kcal/day. For a woman with identical measurements: 720 + 1,093.75 − 150 − 161 = 1,502.75, about 1,503 kcal/day. At a moderate activity factor of 1.55, the man's TDEE is about 2,587 kcal/day and the woman's about 2,329 kcal/day.
How accurate is Mifflin-St Jeor?
For healthy non-obese adults the equation typically lands within about 10% of measured resting energy expenditure; for a 1,600 kcal BMR that is a range of roughly 1,440-1,760. The 2005 systematic review by Frankenfield, Roth-Yousey and Compher found Mifflin-St Jeor the most reliable of the common predictive equations in both non-obese and obese adults, which is why it replaced Harris-Benedict as the default. Accuracy is not uniform: it tends to overestimate in people with high body fat and underestimate in very muscular people, and it was not derived for children, pregnancy, or illness.
Mifflin-St Jeor vs Harris-Benedict vs Katch-McArdle
The three equations answer the same question with different inputs. Use the comparison to understand why calculators disagree, not to cherry-pick the highest number.
- Mifflin-St Jeor (1990): weight, height, age, sex. Best general-purpose choice and the current clinical default.
- Harris-Benedict, revised 1984: same inputs, larger coefficients. Reads a few percent higher and is kept mainly for continuity with older clinical material.
- Katch-McArdle: uses lean body mass only, so it needs body-fat percentage. Best for athletes, very muscular people, and some people with obesity when body composition is known.
BMR vs RMR: what the number actually measures
Basal metabolic rate is measured under strict conditions: after an overnight fast, lying still, in a thermoneutral room. Resting metabolic rate is measured under looser conditions and is usually a few percent higher. In practice the two are close enough that consumer calculators use BMR as the label for both. If you are comparing against a lab test, check which protocol was used before deciding the calculator is wrong.
When the equation is less reliable
Predictive equations are population averages, not measurements. They are weaker for children and adolescents, pregnancy and lactation, adults with very high body fat, highly muscular athletes, people with fever, trauma, burns or thyroid disease, and people with limb loss. In those cases use the result as a starting hypothesis, then adjust from observed weight change over two to three weeks. For clinical nutrition support, indirect calorimetry remains the reference method.
From BMR to a calorie target
Multiply BMR by your activity factor to get TDEE, then adjust for your goal. For fat loss, a deficit of 10-20% of TDEE is a common starting range; a 500 kcal daily deficit corresponds to roughly 0.45 kg (1 lb) of fat per week, though real-world loss is rarely linear. For muscle gain, a surplus of about 5-10% limits unnecessary fat gain. Recalculate after roughly 4-5 kg of weight change, because BMR falls as body mass falls.
Sources and further reading
The formulas and accuracy claims on this page follow the original equation and the standard comparative review. The activity multipliers are the conventional ACE/dietetic table, not part of the 1990 paper itself.
- Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, et al. A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51(2):241-247. doi:10.1093/ajcn/51.2.241
- Frankenfield D, Roth-Yousey L, Compher C. Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in healthy nonobese and obese adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(5):775-789. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.005
- Roza AM, Shizgal HM. The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984;40(1):168-182.
- Harris JA, Benedict FG. A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism in Man. Carnegie Institution of Washington; 1919.
- American Council on Exercise. Activity factor and calorie-expenditure guidance.